It’s been no secret that NASCAR race attendance and television
ratings have been down the last couple of seasons or so. As attendance
and ratings have declined, speculation as to why seems to have bounced
all over the radar. One school of thought for the drop in attendance at
the track is the health, or lack thereof, of the economy. That could be a
contributor. The economy has also been blamed for the lackluster TV
ratings. Maybe so. After all, it seems like more races were on
cable/satellite TV this season than in seasons past. Sure FOX continues
to broadcast the first big chunk of the Sprint Cup schedule, but after
its portion of the schedule, most races are on cable/satellite networks,
like TNT and the ESPN family of networks. Last year, the fall Richmond
race (the last race heading into the Chase) and all 10 Chase races were
on ABC. In 2010, though, only one of those races aired on ABC, with the
rest finding a home on ESPN.
Some, especially fans, have blamed NASCAR’s perceived decline in
popularity on NASCAR, itself. Perhaps for several seasons, NASCAR ruled
itself into poor favor among a certain set of fans. Fans who pointed to
the sanctioning body, itself, said that NASCAR was just too involved in
the racing, that those in the front office, so to speak, should just
step back and let ‘em race. Shouldn’t NASCAR’s recent “boys have at it
stance” have taken care of that problem?
Then there’s the conspiracy theorists. You know, the people who think
races are fixed, that NASCAR decides beforehand who’s going to win on a
given race weekend, or maybe even who’s going to win the championship
in Novemember when the competition heads to Daytona to start the
preceding season in February. NASCAR has been accused, even by some of
its competitors, of creating phantom cautions, or throwing out the
yellow flag to bunch the field back up and make more of a race of it.
Maybe so. But if that does happen, does it happen often, and wouldn’t
that make for better entertainment? At least drivers don’t win races by
margins of multiple laps anymore, or even a single lap, for that matter.
Then there are others who simply say that the racing just isn’t any
good anymore. Really? According to stats released by NASCAR on Tuesday,
the 2010 season was one of the most competitive seasons in Cup Series
history. Of course, one could say that the stats could be biased, and
after all, statistics can be construed and dissected to say pretty much
anything you want them to say. But they’re still worth a look.
To read more, visit Auto Racing Daily.
- add friend
Amanda
Most Recent Entries
- Are Kurt Busch's antics hindering his career?
- He's done Talladega Nights. How about Stroker Ace?
- Who cares who was leading on that restart at Richmond?
- When's the right time to repave a racetrack?
- Are the racing gods opposed to Hendrick win 200?
- Are some rides worth it?
- New Bristol vs. old Bristol: the debate continues
- Come Chase time, will probable Knaus suspension matter?
- Sprint Cup regulars not dominating Nationwide in 2012
- Grubb doing just fine with new driver
- Talent only gets you so far without sponsorship
- Who's going to drive a Dodge in 2013?
- Danica actually teaching NASCAR veterans thing or two
- Owner points valuable commodities
- What are Brian Vickers' options?
- Busch brothers banquet snubbed in own hometown
- Early points systems a lesson in NASCAR math
- World of racing sponsorship changing
- Just how stable is Busch's future with JGR?
- Chase battle turns into two-man grudge match
- Stewart was never that bad, was he?
- Mayfield shoots holes in his innocent stance
- Chase battle a lesson in opposites
- Gordon: from kid to veteran making Cup start 650
- Roush in championship driver's seat
- Are Johnson's title hopes cursed by SI cover?
- Johnson's shot at 2011 title 'too close to call'
- NASCAR, country music go way back
- Race honoree's experience puts life in perspective
- Charlotte may provide Chase spoilage
- Sorenson firing raises questions
- Some count Johnson out too soon
- Past trends show Harvick in ideal position
- Chase like a 2011 'do over' for Stewart
- Keselowski making case for serious title consideration
- Drivers near the bottom not out yet
- A closer look at NASCAR's E15 ethanol
- Team orders probably more common than we think
- Should big deal be made of declined White House invites?
- Earnhardt's legacy continues to influence sport
- Changes continue in 2011
- Champ the same but 2010 season full of change
- Will driver shifts fix the problems at Hendrick
- Where have all the NASCAR fans gone?
- What does the future have in store for Richard Petty Motorsports
- Seats at banquet and bragging rights up for grabs at Homestead
- Busch stands chance of being part of two championships
- Hamlin emerging to replace Johnson as title fave
- Does NASCAR's yellow line rule need revision?
- RPM looks to be on life support with possibly no relief in sight
- The No. 9 team needs to just hit fast forward and skip to 2011
- McMurray right at home at Earnhardt Ganassi
- Who will be the next inductees into the NASCAR Hall of Fame
- Should Chasers get special treatment?
- Kenny Wallace, Brian Scott have heated discussion via Twitter
- A look at NASCAR's appeals process
- No. 33 car opens the flood gates of discussion
- NASCAR Hall of Fame nominee spotlight: David Pearson
- What to do with only one rookie who’s not setting the world on fire
- NASCAR Hall of Fame nominee spotlight: Benny Parsons
- With Chase system, does points leader after 26 races deserve recognition?
- No clear cut favorites for this year's Sprint Cup
- NASCAR Hall of Fame nominee spotlight: Raymond Parks
- NASCAR Hall of Fame nominee spotlight: Bud Moore
- Chase field not official, but pretty much set
- NASCAR Hall of Fame nominee spotlight: Ned Jarrett
- Chase could save Johnson's title hopes
- NASCAR Hall of Fame nominee spotlight: Dale Inman
- Race season's long, but silly season's even longer
- Do haters dislike Busch for dominance or personality issues?
- When it comes to Nationwide Series racing, how many Cup drivers are too many?
- NASCAR Hall of Fame nominee spotlight
- Chase lineup pretty much determined with three to go
- Sponsors have their own silly season
- NASCAR Hall of Fame nominee spotlight: Rick Hendrick
- NASCAR Hall of Fame nominee spotlight: Tim Flock
- Is Elliott Sadler's goose cooked?
- With FR9 issues ironed out, may still be hope for Ford this season
- Will 2010 be last year a Cup driver wins Nationwide title?
- NASCAR Hall of Fame nominee spotlight: Richie Evans
- NASCAR Hall of Fame nominee spotlight: Jerry Cook
- NASCAR may have finally drawn line in sand
- How far should NASCAR’s “boys have at it” stance be allowed to go?
- Does Chase need overhaul?
- NASCAR Hall of Fame nominee spotlight: Richard Childress
- Is RPM a sinking ship?
- Looking back at the first half of the Nationwide Series season
- NASCAR Hall of Fame nominee spotlight: Red Byron
- Agendas differ as season reaches halfway mark
- NASCAR Hall of Fame nominee spotlight: Buck Baker
- NASCAR Hall of Fame nominee spotlight: Bobby Allison
- Nationwide car may be new, but one of them's a throwback
- More unknowns than usual heading into Daytona
- NASCAR reveals Hall of Fame nominees


1 Comments
fullspeedgirl +Delete - on Nov 24th 2010 at 1:13pm
Could it also be something about the top drivers being no longer relateable to the typical fan, but instead are viewed as "celebrities"? I've personally heard this complaint.
Post a comment